[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 08:09:11AM +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote:
> > Uhm, so what about your 2015-01 proposal then? That one "applied
> > retroactively" no less than this one.
> I don't think 2015-01 apply retroactively.
> I think allocation made before implementation of 2015-01 are free from 
> limitations.

Both do not apply retroactively, as in "transfers that happened before
the proposal came into effect are nullified".

Both proposal *do* apply to all *future* transfers - regardless of the
allocation date of the to-be-transferred address space.  

This is the way our policy changes have always worked: affecting future
*actions* to be done with numbers.  Only one single proposal ever affected
pre-existing assignments in a big way, 2007-01 - and that was seen as 
necessary (and in hindsight, given the amount of attempted fraud regarding 
address blocks, it was a very good decision).

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160617/05e6e88f/attachment.sig>