[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

So let's not spend on this proposal and spend on deploying IPv6 which is the better way.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Jim Reid
Sent: June 17, 2016 4:36 PM
To: Payam Poursaied <payam at rasana.net>
Cc: RIPE Address Policy WG List <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)


> On 17 Jun 2016, at 12:47, Payam Poursaied <payam at rasana.net> wrote:
> 
> Let's think for a better way to make it work for everybody and allow more people on the earth to gain access to the Internet. 

Indeed. That better way is already here. It’s called IPv6. The effort that’s being wasted here haggling over the dregs of v4 would be better spent deploying IPv6.