This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Thu Jun 16 23:53:39 CEST 2016
Il 16/06/2016 17:39, Nick Hilliard ha scritto: > Remco van Mook wrote: >> Explicitly states that the current IPv4 allocation policy applies to >> all available IPv4 address space held by the RIPE NCC that has not >> been reserved or marked to be returned to IANA > This is probably useful. It would also probably be useful to define a > term to replace the name "last /8" so that it can be referred to > specifically in the policy documentation, e.g. "the remaining > unallocated ipv4 pool" or something along those lines. Totally not as > catchy as "the last /8", but sadly that is the nature of policy. I agree too this can be useful. I think even Jim can agree. We had a quick chat about it in Copenhagen. I even wrote apwg chair about a new proposal simply add this clarification but stopped since Marco noticed was already in this unacceptable 2016-03. > >> Adds a consideration to the IPv4 allocation policy that the LIR >> should conserve whole or part of their final /22 allocation for >> interoperability purposes > Neutral on this. People will do what they are going to do, even if it's > short-sighted. > >> Bans transfers of final /22 allocations >> Changes the “status”field in the RIPE Database to reflect the >> transferability of an INETNUM > I'm against this because it conflicts with the core purpose of the RIPE > registry, which is to ensure accurate registration of resources. > Formally banning transfers will not stop transfers; it will only stop > those transfers from being registered which will lead to inaccurate > registry information. > > Overall, I am against the core proposal, namely banning transfers from > the remaining unallocated ipv4 pool. completely agree > > Nick > -- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori at wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info at wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160616/9552ec0c/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 41774 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160616/9552ec0c/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]