[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 16:14, Remco van Mook wrote:Dear all,
> 
> I would encourage everyone to carefully read this second version (and not

Done.

> just respond "no, still hate it, kill it with fire") as it is quite
> different from the first version.

Yes, it is "quite" different (depending on the definition of "quite"). 
But still hate it, kill it with fire. Use napalm if necessary.

> Basically the only restriction left is to disallow transfers on all "last
> /8 space"* going forward, and there is some language added to the policy
> that tries to raise awareness that if you just go and parcel out that
> entire allocation to endusers, you might end up feeling a little bit
> silly a couple of years from now.

And makes clear the retroactive intent.
In fact, only use fire to kill it if you don't have anything more
effective (to kill it).

--
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
fr.ccs