This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Jun 16 20:01:26 CEST 2016
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016, at 17:14, Tomasz Śląski @ KEBAB wrote: > My 3 cents - proposal 2016-03 is in contradiction with the possibility > of opening multiple LIR, which is nothing more than selling IP for money > and build additional income for RIPE. The main problem being that "multiple LIRs" is voted by the memebership (RIPE NCC), while policy (including 2016-03) is "agreed" by the RIPE community (people on working-group lists). Yes, I do agree there is an "ideological split" between the two. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] comments on the revised 2016-03
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]