This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Remco van Mook
remco.vanmook at gmail.com
Thu Jun 16 16:14:08 CEST 2016
Thank you Marco. Dear all, I would encourage everyone to carefully read this second version (and not just respond "no, still hate it, kill it with fire") as it is quite different from the first version. Basically the only restriction left is to disallow transfers on all "last /8 space"* going forward, and there is some language added to the policy that tries to raise awareness that if you just go and parcel out that entire allocation to endusers, you might end up feeling a little bit silly a couple of years from now. Looking forward to a positive discussion, Remco * any suggestions for a better title for this space are most welcome as well > On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:58 , Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net> wrote: > > Dear colleagues, > > The Discussion Period for the policy proposal 2016-03, "Locking Down the Final /8 Policy" has been extended until 15 July 2016. > > The goal of this proposal is to ban transfers of allocations made under the final /8 policy. > > The text of the proposal has been revised based on mailing list feedback and we have published a new version (2.0) today. > As a result, a new Discussion Phase has started for the proposal. > > Some of the differences from version 1.0 include: > - Several restrictions have been removed > - Adds a recommendation that LIRs should conserve whole or part of their final /22 allocation for interoperability purposes > > You can find the full proposal at: > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-03 > > We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments to <address-policy-wg at ripe.net>. > > Regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 842 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160616/4b491c5a/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 Discussion Period extended until 15 July 2016 (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]