[address-policy-wg] IPv4 reserved space

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, NTX NOC wrote:

> Not correct. My opinion is that all IPs space should be completely free
> for all members. It's like letters in the alphabet. You should not pay
> for letters, you should not pay for your unique name+surname (symbols
> that allow to identify you like IP address numbers).
>
> So to allow progress to come in we need to use abilities, that we have,
> reasonably. And here I asked about reserved IPv4 space.
>
> I am here in this discussions because we try to help people to get IP
> space easy and faster. And I am show here that there a lot of space that
> could be used.

Well, using 240/3 isn't something that realistic. It is a lot easier to 
deply IPv6 than to get 240/3 working for any significant amount of users.

We have run out of "letters" to use. The answer to the problem with "we've 
run out of letters" is to deploy IPv6. It's unfortunate that ISPs in your 
market aren't interested in Ipv6 deployment, but it's the only answer to 
your question.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se