[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


Hi all, 

dear Jan,

On 09/06/2016 17:23, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
> In other words, it's fine for a LIR to be an end user, and in
> principle, it seems sensible that policy acknowledges that, but
> avoids making unnecessary limitations that interfere with that.

I agree that a lot of LIRs are End Users.

But the important point is that most End Users, however, are *not* LIRs 
which really means we cannot take the ones for the others.

So, if the meaning of "last /8" policy is to let End Users have a minimal
vital access to the ressource, then we must really write "End User" when 
we think "End User". Which leads to a very different wording (and meaning)
of the policy that is to be obeyed by a LIR.

Best regards,
Sylvain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iF4EAREIAAYFAldez/kACgkQJBGsD8mtnREZFgD+INALGOduxHzQ+4hX51fLXey8
3Ys5t8DDJNe448pWbK8A/i+Sfudir5dprT0LXKQSONFN9KYgond3sKSWW8Ki06pF
=gta2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----