This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sun Jun 12 00:14:43 CEST 2016
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016, at 22:50, Aled Morris wrote: > I am just surprised that we encourage organisations who don't participate > (or have any interest in participating) in the RIPE policy process, or any > of the mechanics of Internet governance, to join the RIPE NCC and > therefore get a vote on budget and board member decisions. Well, hopefully (depends for who), they don't (https://www.ripe.net/participate/meetings/gm/meetings/may-2016/voting-report). At least not yet. But you do have a valid point. Just hope they don't come with the idea that the NCC should stop following community's policies (and hand things over to national governments, or decice policies to be followed at the GM). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]