This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aled Morris
aled.w.morris at googlemail.com
Sat Jun 11 22:50:10 CEST 2016
On 11 June 2016 at 21:05, Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl> wrote: > Being a member of the RIPE NCC has nothing to do with policy making (or > education or standards for that matter). This is a RIPE community working > group, not a RIPE NCC working group. Everybody is welcome to participate in > this working group, not just RIPE NCC members. > > Sorry yes, I was clumsy in my wording. I am just surprised that we encourage organisations who don't participate (or have any interest in participating) in the RIPE policy process, or any of the mechanics of Internet governance, to join the RIPE NCC and therefore get a vote on budget and board member decisions. Aled -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160611/b2fae1d7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]