This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Sat Jun 11 14:01:40 CEST 2016
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016, at 17:19, Aled Morris wrote: > I'm curious to know what benefit such customers perceive from being LIRs > (rather than just taking IP address space from you). Hi, They have "their own" space, one /22 for them alone. Not sure this is something easy (even less cost-effective) enough to obtain these days. > From what you say they don't run their own networks - do they assign > resources to their downstream customers? Don't know about Dominik's customers, but some of them do. You can find several kinds of network-less service providers out there in the wild. Then there's the issue of things done "inside out" : ISPs running on ASSIGNED PI (not very willing to deal with RIPE / RIPE NCC) and end-users on ALLOCATED PA (willing to do so).
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]