This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Aled Morris
aled.w.morris at googlemail.com
Fri Jun 10 17:19:15 CEST 2016
On Friday, 10 June 2016, Dominik Nowacki <dominik at clouvider.co.uk> wrote: > Aled, > The data you provided is not relevant. > > For example, we have a significant number of Customers who have a number > of servers with us, are LIRs themselves, but we do BGP for them, as such > there is a significant number of /22s originated from our AS, yet not > owned, nor operated by us. > I'm curious to know what benefit such customers perceive from being LIRs (rather than just taking IP address space from you). From what you say they don't run their own networks - do they assign resources to their downstream customers? Not from the 185/8 allocation obviously. Aled -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160610/2afdcb56/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2016-03 New Policy Proposal (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]