This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Erik Bais - A2B Internet
ebais at a2b-internet.com
Sat Feb 6 20:55:45 CET 2016
Hi Sascha, The policy proposal states : > 2.2 Transfer Restrictions > Scarce resources, which are understood as those resources that are allocated or assigned >by the RIPE NCC on a restricted basis (such as IPv4 or 16-bit ASNs), cannot be >transferred for 24 months from the date the resource was received by the resource holder. >This restriction also applies if the resource was received due to a change in the >organisation’s business (such as a merger or acquisition). Point 2.2 already states what is to be understood by scares resources. All RIPE NCC issued IPv4 and 16bit ASNs. That means indeed as the IA states : PI IPv4 and IPv4 PA space and 16 bit ASNs .. Is there something missing ? Regards, Erik Bais > Op 6 feb. 2016 om 19:57 heeft Sascha Luck [ml] <apwg at c4inet.net> het volgende geschreven: > >> On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 02:54:33PM +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: >> [x] yes, this makes sense, go there > > +1 However: I'd like to see a paragraph defining which resources are > "scarce resources" That way, it is immediately clear which > resources are covered by hold times etc, and more importantly > there is a formal process by which a resource is declared "scarce" > (through the PDP). The impact statement currently states: > > "The RIPE NCC understands "scarce resources" to include IPv4 PA, > IPv4 PI and 16-bit AS Numbers. If the community declares other > resources to be scarce, the list of resources for which the > holding period will apply will be adjusted accordingly." > > This needs to be part of the policy to avoid doubt and increase > clarity to both NCC personnel and resource holders. > >> Remco suggested adding references to the new policy document in >> lieu of the removed sections in ripe-638, ripe-649, and >> ripe-655. I would not object to that. > > Sensible addition. > rgds, > Sascha Luck > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160206/d526709f/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-04 New Draft Documents and Impact Analysis Published (RIPE Resource Transfer Policies)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]