[address-policy-wg] 2016-03 decision at end of discussion period (Locking Down the Final /8 Policy)

Hi Nick,

On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 03:55:20PM +0100, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> >   Nick Hilliard - "because it will create underground and unregistered
> >                    transfers of non-transferrable /22s"
> > 
> >     answered by Sander Steffan
> 
> I should have replied at the time because Sander's response was, in my
> opinion, inadequate:

I found it convincing, but most likely I'm not as pessimistic yet regarding
what people might be willing to do for a bit of extra money.

(I do also see the risk for the buyer as totally inacceptable, as long
as there are "official and documentable" transfers available)


Anyway: formally we're outside any phase where opposition to the proposal
would be recorded, so I take this as clarification regarding my summary 
(thanks).

Please do not let us stop you from repeating your concerns in the review
phase, of course - but of course, please do take the impact analysis into 
account (the NCC might see the same risk, or not).

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160816/f5c8d996/attachment.sig>