[address-policy-wg] Update on ALLOCATED PI/UNSPECIFIED

Hi,

On Thu, Aug 04, 2016 at 04:33:48PM +0000, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> Can you please expand on this? What are the risks that registrants of "not
> really real PI" face? Andrea's slide included a bullet stating that:
> 
> "Many LIRs do not have contact with ASSIGNED PI customers anymore"
> 
> Should I understand that to mean that there is a risk the LIR could take 
> back the assignment?

This is one potential risk, or someone else could try to grab it and
claim "this is mine", with no contractual data at the NCC to settle the
dispute.  Without a clear agreement and clear policies to govern these
numbers, it's hard to rely on anything.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 5082 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160804/0853bbdf/attachment.bin>