[address-policy-wg] Fwd: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE Policy Proposals - April Update

Dear Sergiu,

about your example and its eventual realtionship with the proposal 2015-05:
Company X would have not limit in receive address space as described in 
transfert or allocation policies.
The limit described in 2015-05 would be applied to the LIR that assigned 
space to Company X and, as described in your example, later transfered 
the space in Company X registry.
This LIR is supposed to not need address space as it moved it outside 
its registry so it would not be able to request an additional /22 
allocation from pool outside 185/8 standing on 2015-05 proposal

On the other hand if Company X after its sing up as a new LIR after 18 
months need more space and there is enough space outside 185/8 would be 
able to request an additional /22 standing on  2015-05 proposal. The LIR 
that offered the first /22 to Company X as "assigned resource" could 
also request an additional /22 allocation if its registry is holding 
less than a /20 IPv4.

hope this help

regards

Riccardo


Il 29/04/2016 10:38, Sergiu IANCIUC ha scritto:
> hello,
>
> PLS, take in consideration the situation
>
> Company  X  has  a  /22 from its LIR. The LIR can not offer more IPv4
> spaces   and the Company X becomes a LIR to satisfy its needs. Now, it
> is logical that the LIR (if agreed between these 2 LIRs) transfers the
> space  allocated  to the Company X (now the new LIR) AND THIS have to
> not be the part from the policy -
>
> "requirements,  such  as  the LIR has not transferred any IPv4 address
> space before."
>
> What are you thinking about?
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
>
> -
> Sergiu IANCIUC
> SC ITNS.NET SRL
>
>
> MD-2068, Moldova
> or. Chisinau, str. Miron Costin 3/1
> tel.: +373 22 877 877
> fax : +373 22 44 11 73
> mobile: +373 690 22 111
> url: http://www.itns.md
>
>
> Save a tree... Don't print this email unless you have to...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> This is a forwarded message
> From: Marco Schmidt <mschmidt at ripe.net>
> To: ncc-announce at ripe.net
> Date: Friday, April 29, 2016, 11:18:23 AM
> Subject: [ncc-announce] [news] RIPE Policy Proposals - April Update
>
>
> ===8<==============Original message text===============
> Dear colleagues,
>
> Here is our monthly overview of open policy proposals and their stage in
> the RIPE Policy Development Process (PDP).
>
> If you wish to join the discussion about a particular proposal, please
> do so on the relevant working group mailing list.
>
> Proposals Open for Discussion:
> 2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"
>
> Proposals Awaiting Input:
> 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"
> 2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the Abuse-c Policy"
>
>
> Proposal Overviews:
>
> PROPOSAL: 2015-05, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria"
> OVERVIEW: Aims to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 IPv4
> allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. The latest version of the
> proposal suggests several requirements, such as the LIR cannot hold more
> than a /20 IPv4, must document their IPv6 deployment and has not
> transferred any IPv4 address space before.
> STATUS: Discussion Phase
> WHERE TO COMMENT: Address Policy Working Group: address-policy-wg at ripe.net
> DEADLINE: 13 May 2016
> FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05
>
> =====
>
> The following proposals are awaiting input before they can go any
> further in the PDP.
>
> PROPOSAL: 2015-04, "RIPE Resource Transfer Policies"
> OVERVIEW: Aims to create a single transfer policy with all relevant
> information on the transfer of Internet number resources, replacing text
> in several RIPE Policies. The proposal also introduces a 24-month
> holding period for IPv4 addresses and 16-bit ASNs after any change of
> holdership.
> RIPE NCC IMPACT ANALYSIS: Includes the point how the 24-month holding
> period for scarce resources will be applied.
> STATUS: Review Phase – Awaiting decision from working group chair
> FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-04
>
> PROPOSAL: 2016-01, "Include Legacy Internet Resource Holders in the
> Abuse-c Policy"
> OVERVIEW: Aims for a mandatory abuse contact for Legacy Internet
> Resource holders in the RIPE Database.
> STATUS: Discussion Phase – Awaiting decision from proposer
> FULL PROPOSAL: https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-01
>
>
> The RIPE NCC provides an overview of current RIPE Policy Proposals on
> www.ripe.net:
> https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/current-proposals/current-policy-proposals
>
> We look forward to your involvement in the PDP.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Marco Schmidt
> RIPE Policy Development Officer
> RIPE NCC
>
>
>
> ===8<===========End of original message text===========
>
>
>
>

-- 

Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rgori at wirem.net
Mobile:  +39 339 8925947
Mobile:  +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943

WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285

--------------------------------------------------------------------
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to info at wirem.net
         Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160430/06355f52/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 41774 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160430/06355f52/attachment.jpg>