This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Fri Apr 22 18:10:13 CEST 2016
Hi Randy, Il 22/04/2016 10:05, Randy Bush ha scritto: > believing ipv4 allocation as an incentive for ipv6 deployment is yet > another in a long line of ipv6 marketing fantasies/failures. sure, give > them a v6 prefix, and they may even announce it. but will they convert > their infrastructure, oss, back ends, customers, ... to ipv6? that > decision is driven by very different business cases. I can assure that I am doing any effort to do it. The way I can, but doing it. I also have customers asking the same time: IPv4 resources and cusultin service about IPv6 Most common case is "can you give me this some resources for my project? In the while we want to start IPv6 can you help us in doing it?" normally is /27 to /25. reiceved one request for one /23 > > the purpose of the last /8 policy was to let new entrants have teenie > bits of ipv4 to join the internet, which will require v4 for a long > while. I cannot be against this. But if it was so easy someone should explain why existing LIRs already holding address space can submit a request for one /22 from pool after 09/2012 Not discriminate between LIRs sizes is a point but for competitiveness we can't say a /22 is enought to survive on the market today. > > randy > -- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori at wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info at wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160422/e2e9dcd0/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 41774 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160422/e2e9dcd0/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]