[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi

Fairly speaking, if market price above certain point, people will deplete the pool really fast, as long as it makes business sense.

Unless we start using /24 policy in which effectively encourage people seek growth in the transfer market---in which it is what it should be, is not such a bad idea.



> On 23 Apr 2016, at 00:00, Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org> wrote:
> 
> Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:
>> I do understand that. I just do not agree with the "as long as possible,
>> no matter what" approach.
>> For me, the issue is that right now we are in a "please suffer, the
>> solution is not working yet" situation.
> 
> and your solution is that you want future market entrants to suffer more
> than you're suffering now because there will be no address space
> whatsoever left for them?
> 
> Nick
>