[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi Roger,


Il 21/04/2016 08:40, Roger Jørgensen ha scritto:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
> <ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016, at 12:50, Niall O'Reilly wrote:
> <snip>
>>>     As Roger Jørgensen has explained, once the policy was triggered, it
>>> was to apply to all subsequent allocations.
>> However, in the meantime some events happened:
>>   - recovered space issue - space returned to IANA 2012-05 to 2014-04 and
>>   gradually returned starting 2014-05
> already known, space would be returned, and redistributed, it would still
> be covered by the policy since it would cover all allocation after that point
> in time.
>
>
>>   - 2013-03 - no need checking
>>   - 2014-04 - no ipv6 requirement
> adjustment, as we do with all policy. Maybe we should make it harder
> to get IPv4 space? ... but how would that help on the part we really need,
> more IPv6? Also it might over time make the RIR registry incomplete
> and full of error, that will hurt the Internet way more than the current
> gaming actual harm... as sad as that is... :-(
>
>
>>   - still keeping a high (~= /8) level of "somehow available space"
> as said earlier, it does not matter, the policy was there to safeguard
> some space for future startups. We are just lucky that the space has
> grown due to return and reallocation!
Are you sure that we all here are saving space for new entrants? or 
there can be someone saving economic value of its allocations?
Everyone of us should be aware that when a resource is exhausted there's 
no more value in it.
I would know all allocations holded by pleople to figure how much 
everyone is philanthropic
Please understand I am not referring to anyone in particoular can be all 
of us me included or nobody
And again remeber I am not for fast depletion.
>
>
>>   - policy abuse, pushing to limits and general change in "who is a LIR"
>>   (get-to-transfer, multi-LIR/company, out-of-continent LIRs - more and
>>   more of them, corporate LIRs or simply "just want my damn ASN and /24"
>>   LIRs)
> ... and here we are again back at the core, the abuse/gaming the system
> to get more address space. The only real solution to this is to deploy
> IPv6. Handing out more address space than  /22 is not a solution
> because there will always be a need for more. There is no upper limit
> and we just run out way faster, and as said over and over again, that
> will ruin the point with this policy - safeguard some space for the future
> startups.
>
>
>
> I am happy with giving RIPE NCC power to turn down request from
> obvious fake company... however that has it's own problem and not
> all of them are solvable by this working group, some might not be
> solvable at all.
>
>
>> I hope everybody does realize how this proposal came to life.
> giving out more space to those that ask for it is not a good solution
> with the future in mind. However if everyone want to be greedy here
> and now and say screw the future (sorry the language)...
>
>
>

-- 

Ing. Riccardo Gori
e-mail: rgori at wirem.net
Mobile:  +39 339 8925947
Mobile:  +34 602 009 437
Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943

WIREM Fiber Revolution
Net-IT s.r.l.
Via Cesare Montanari, 2
47521 Cesena (FC)
Tel +39 0547 1955485
Fax +39 0547 1950285

--------------------------------------------------------------------
	CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons
above and may contain confidential information. If you have received
the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof
is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete
the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re-
plying to info at wirem.net
         Thank you
WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC)
--------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160422/b7316524/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 41774 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160422/b7316524/attachment.jpg>