[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi,

On Tue, Apr 19, 2016, at 16:55, Stepan Kucherenko wrote:
> Why not just check for AAAA record for their main site and mention of 
> IPv6 somewhere, like "/X for every customer on every tariff" or 
> something similar depending on the market ?
> 
> It may put enough pressure for them to actually roll it out.

Let's not put our marketing departments in the loop. Some of them get
scared (for nothing).

> I don't support this proposal in it's current state though. It won't 
> help IPv6 rollout as it is, it can actually make it worse because some 
> LIRs will be able to postpone it even more. But if combined with 
> additional incentives...it might just work.

Some tiny bit of (free) IPv4 is the incentive. I can't find better. Just
need to make sure the condition is well-written.

> Although ideas of only giving /24 to those who don't need more, and 
> probably just /24 after some arbitrary depletion state (/10?) would be 
> great as well. Anyone writing a policy for that yet ?

That was part of the initial idea (see
https://ripe70.ripe.net/presentations/93-Last-_8-allocation-size.pdf )