[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi,

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 01:14:16PM +0200, Riccardo Gori wrote:
> sorry but maybe this feeds the confusion about last /8 appling only to 
> 185/8 or the whole RIPE available pool

There was confusion about this in the past, so the NCC consulted the working 
group, we discussed it here on the list, and the conclusion was "as soon 
as the /8 kicks in, it will affect everything in the RIPE NCC free pool, 
period" - no going back to the older policy (should the pool grow over a
/8), no "different policies for different /8s".

I thought we even did a PDP on this, but cannot find it - so maybe someone
else with better googling fu can find the discussion.

Gert Doering
        APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160420/70222105/attachment.sig>