[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

On 17.04.2016 12.43, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
>> 5) No new IPv4 policies.
> As much as this might seem like a good idea for stopping the endless
> arguments about changing the last /8 allocation policy, the only thing
> which will actually put and end to these arguments is final depletion.
> Everything else is deck-chair rearrangement.
I think this is a very good point.
While we say that the community is much larger than the RIPE NCC 
membership, the RIPE NCC membership, which is part of the community, is 
much larger than this working-group.

With the current growth rate of RIPE NCC membership - the community 
grows - and the opinion on what is the best policy is changing.

What was discussed yesterday may not be as valid tomorrow.

Keeping the registry up to date - with correct information - will always 
be top priority.
Lets make sure we do not have policies that affects this.

-- 
Hans Petter Holen
Mobile +47 45 06 60 54 | hph at oslo.net | http://hph.oslo.net