[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi

I think an more interesting break down would be the companies' business(e.g
the industry they are in)

As I understand, more and more end user are becoming LIR as their ISP
refuse to give them IP, therefore it fundamentally changed the
very definition of LIR.

The outbreak in the member mailing list last time reminds us how big that
group could be.

What current ISP doing nowadays, instead of charging customer and apply to
RIPE for their customer's IP, they ask their customer come to RIPE to
become their own LIR and get their own IP then manage it for the customer.
In which, results what we see today, shipping companies, banks, even
airlines become LIR.


On Sunday 17 April 2016, Gert Doering <gert at space.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 09:52:15AM +0300, Adrian Pitulac wrote:
> > I see the same explanation again and again and again. But I see no real
> > argument from you guys. No statistics, no trending, no prediction, just
> > "keep the ipv4 last longer". Can you do better than that?
>
> Marco has provided statistics about the IPv4 pool runout, broken down by
> "185" and "other addresses returned".  These show that while the total
> number of addresses in the NCC stock is sort of "keeping up", about half
> of 185 is used up - so with the current trend going on, 185 will be
> used up in 2018-2019 or so
>
>
> https://labs.ripe.net/Members/marco_schmidt/taking-a-closer-look-at-the-last-slash-8
>
> Gert Doering
>         -- APWG chair
> --
> have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
>
> SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
> Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
> D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
> Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
>


-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160417/008000d6/attachment.html>