This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Adrian Pitulac
adrian at idsys.ro
Sun Apr 17 09:31:04 CEST 2016
On 17/04/16 10:01, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 8:52 AM, Adrian Pitulac <adrian at idsys.ro > <mailto:adrian at idsys.ro>> wrote: > > > I see the same explanation again and again and again. But I see no > real argument from you guys. No statistics, no trending, no > prediction, just "keep the ipv4 last longer". Can you do better > than that? > > > Is this your best argument *for* the policy? That you haven't read > enough posts well enough to find the arguments against, nor to find > the statistics, the trends, the predictions? Seriously? > -- > Jan Jan, I think you should read my previous posts, I've come up with several arguments, none of which have been seriously discussed and analyzed. Also FYI I've been reading the discussions here for a long time, and this intervention is my first because I see the same explanation again and again without no base. This should be a discussion on arguments not just a presentation of personal "default" denial of any change to policy. This is what I saw until now. I was under the impression that people here can start a discussion and analyze the *for* and *against* arguments until we reach a conclusion. Am I wrong? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160417/cf516da7/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]