[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

>> well, it is some years too late for it to go along with the last /8,
>> policy unless you have a time machine.  but it might mean we won't have
>> to deal with the endless proposals to modify the last /8 policy which
>> seem to come up every year, flood the mailing list, and eventually fail.
> Exactly, the sad part is, this is essentially the last and only thing you
> can propose a policy regarding v4.

not exactly.  one can propose something in the opposite direction;
allocations from the last /8 be reduced to /24.  it may make ipv4
last longer for the new entrants.  and a /24 should be sufficient
for a large nat.

i.e. i was serious the other day.

randy