[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

On Sunday 17 April 2016, Randy Bush <randy at psg.com> wrote:

> > I seriously liking the idea of some APNIC colleagues "no more v4
> > policy from today on".
>
> that was my proposal.  the sitting apnic address policy chair went into
> bureaucratic insanity and drowned it.


Hoesntly, I think it is best  companion policy goes alone with the last /8
policy, as we all know and expected people would love to come back propose
to get the last piece of free pile eatted now instead of in few years.

V4 are not like guns, someone holding it won't cause danger to anyone. And
we don't really dealing with abuse in the policy, and we don't have any v4
left to distribute.

So why we need further policy proposal regarding something that policy can
not manage, control, distribute, so what for?

The policy exists at start mostly for fair distribution, book keeper job so
internet can function, now distribution job is done, book keep only
requires transparency and easy for anyone update their record honestly
without worrying anything, that's how we get best registry job done.


> we could try it here.
>
> randy
>


-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160417/bb1be1f1/attachment.html>