This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Riccardo Gori
rgori at wirem.net
Sat Apr 16 13:37:13 CEST 2016
Hi Nick, everyone is aware that fairness is a relative concept. What we mean in this proposal is that actual policy is encouraging transfer market in some way 'cause there is a transfert market to feed. Is someone asks for space because of need he won't sell outside the resource just to make quick bucks. This proposal aims to address the real need and give a little incentive (the only around are now t-shirts mentioned by Radu) to IPv6 regards Riccardo Il 16/04/2016 13:02, Nick Hilliard ha scritto: > Riccardo Gori wrote: >> I think this policy is not for faster exhaustion but for "farier >> exhaustion" and is offering a path to go over IPv4 while still needing >> it to grow. > It was only a matter of time before someone pulled out the word "fair". > > "Fair" is a hugely subjective term best left to experts in the field: > namely children below the age of 16, all of whom have extraordinary > skills in the art of determining what is "fair", and more importantly, > what is not. > > In order to make things better for one section of the RIPE community, > another part of the community will need to pay the price. There are > several ways of doing this: we could tilt the policy in favour of larger > organisations at the cost of smaller organisations, or smaller > organisations at the cost of larger organisations, or existing > organisations in favour of future market entrants. > > Currently the ipv4 allocation policy gives precedence to future market > entrants and smaller players. This is an unusually altruistic position, > given that future market entrants have no say in how current policy is > determined. > > 2015-05 will change this balance further in favour of smaller players at > the expense of future market entrants. > > At a helicopter level and speaking as a smaller LIR, I don't believe > that this is a good thing to do and consequently I do not support the > policy change. > > Nick -- Ing. Riccardo Gori e-mail: rgori at wirem.net Mobile: +39 339 8925947 Mobile: +34 602 009 437 Profile: https://it.linkedin.com/in/riccardo-gori-74201943 WIREM Fiber Revolution Net-IT s.r.l. Via Cesare Montanari, 2 47521 Cesena (FC) Tel +39 0547 1955485 Fax +39 0547 1950285 -------------------------------------------------------------------- CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This message and its attachments are addressed solely to the persons above and may contain confidential information. If you have received the message in error, be informed that any use of the content hereof is prohibited. Please return it immediately to the sender and delete the message. Should you have any questions, please contact us by re- plying to info at wirem.net Thank you WIREM - Net-IT s.r.l.Via Cesare Montanari, 2 - 47521 Cesena (FC) -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160416/15a83324/attachment.html> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: logoWirem_4cm_conR.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 41774 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160416/15a83324/attachment.jpg>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]