[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 11:21, Tim Chown wrote:
> > On 15 Apr 2016, at 10:02, Adrian Pitulac <adrian at idsys.ro> wrote:
> > 
> > but from statistics and from my point of view, ARIN depletion of pools, resulted directly in IPV6 growth.
> 
> Well, no, not if you look at
> https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html, which shows steady
> IPv6 growth towards Google services (approaching 11% now).

That's global.
For Canada : http://stats.labs.apnic.net/ipv6/CA that's clearly visible.
Less so for the US.

> Similarly wrt active IPv6 routes -
> http://bgp.potaroo.net/v6/as2.0/index.html

Route count, like allocations made by RIRs is completely irrelevant. 
Having IPv6 announced but null-routed at the border and completely
absent inside the network (or only present on core equipment) is
commonplace.