[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi,

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016, at 07:48, Riccardo Gori wrote:

> We are dealing with the same amount of space as September 2012 that in 
> the meanwhile has been abused in several ways and there are really no 
> incentives to IPv6 adoption.
> 
> There was only one requirement to obtain one IPv4  /22: request and 
> obtain at least from /32 IPv6 to a maximum of /29 IPv6.
> Am I wrong or this requirement has been removed?!?! Please explain that 
> to a new entrant...

Not only that, but since 2014 IPv4 blocks are to be handed without any
justification. Basically RIPE NCC sells IPv4 adresses. I would
definitely NOT call that a success.

> I think this policy is not for faster exhaustion but for "farier 
> exhaustion" and is offering a path to go over IPv4 while still needing 
> it to grow.

What we are trying to compensante is the "fair" part which is
diminishing with time.


--
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
fr.ccs