This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Denis Fondras
ripe at liopen.fr
Fri Apr 15 20:08:23 CEST 2016
> Big LIRs (mean with a lot of v4) provide to small ISPs internet+v4 ranges, > now, how it is possible the new-LIR with only /22 do the same, i know - no > way. > As there is no IPv4 available anymore for free, new-LIR can't become a big-LIR without big expenses (but with IPv6). That's a simple rule any new LIR can (and must) understand. If you read your LIR contract it is stated clearly you won't get more from RIPE. > In other way the small-ISP can become a LIR, this will continue exhaustion > of the last /8 for sure. > If "small-ISP" really wants to play the serious game, it should become LIR anyway. Denis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]