[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi Riccardo,

Thanks for the reply.

> with 3 stars you have a working IPv6 deployment but you are not listed as
> RIPEness 'cause of absence of reverse delegation for IPv6
> If you host DNS servers for reverse delegation outside of you network on a
> IPv4 only provider you can't reach 4 or 5 stars even with a perfectly
> working IPv6 deployment
> 3 stars looked to be a first good step to "taste" IPv6

This is what leads me to think the policy panders to one specific
category of LIR.  Either have no IPv6 requirements, or require IPv6
available to all customers.

I think it is reckless to quadruple the amount of scarce IPv4 space
given to new entrants at the cost to future entrants, and in case
it wasn't clear from yesterday's email, I'm afraid I do not support
this policy.

All the best,
Rob