[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 Discussion Period extended until 13 May 2016 (Last /8 Allocation Criteria Revision)

Hi,

On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 04:59:55PM +0100, Aled Morris wrote:
> I would hope that large LIRs don't make objections to this proposal just
> because they don't see any benefit to them - that come come across as
> selfish.

Objections or support for a proposal is made by individuals, not by
organizations.  Individuals may happen to work for large or small LIRs,
or not for a LIR at all - *but* people with lots of experience, and
based on that, some foresight, might end up in senior positions in
large LIRs...  so look at the arguments, not at what domain is in the
mail address.

(Turning the argument around: "small LIRs asking *for* this proposal" is 
selfish as well, no?)

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20160415/a1562285/attachment.sig>