[address-policy-wg] "last /8" allocation size - community feedback request before engaging PDP

On Mon, 14 Sep 2015, Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN wrote:

> Hello everybody,
>
> Back at RIPE70 Elvis and me presented some ideas about revising the IPv4
> allocation policy (
> https://ripe70.ripe.net/presentations/93-Last-_8-allocation-size.pdf )

Interesting presentation. There are some points there I was no aware of.

I would be interested in getting an educated guess what would happen if we 
went with the following policy:

You get /20 to /24 depending on need/want instead of /22 for everybody.

This would apply until we have last-/10 where we then go to /22-/24 
depending on need/want. We would treat recovered pool the same as last /8, 
it's just treated as "addresses" so /10 is "/10 worth of adresses".

My goal is still to have IPv4 addresses according to this policy by 2020.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike at swm.pp.se