This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Oct 29 21:27:03 CET 2015
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015, at 15:20, Sylvain Vallerot wrote: > Unfortunately I suspect we lost the power to do so when we adopted the catastrophic > "no need" policy, since big LIRs would easily declare fake assignments now to fill > and reserve their already routed but yet unsed allocations. We would have to restore > needs-based policy first. Things are a little bit more complex than that, but globally you are right, and we should have been more vocal years ago, when nonsense started to develop (no need, no new PI, PI trasnfer, ...). -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]