[address-policy-wg] address-policy-wg

Hi

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:59:44PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> On 29/10/2015 14:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> > Call to order.  Wishing for non-existant technologies to overcome IPv4
> > shortage is totally off-topic here.
> 
> Can I also humbly suggest adding "let's make the RIPE NCC take existing
> IPv4 allocations away from someone else (and give them to me)" to this list?

Technically, this would be a matter for this working group (coming up with
a reclaim policy for unused allocations) - but that would have to be a 
separate proposal.  For the particular proposal under discussion (2015-05), 
which has a very specific focus, this topic is out of scope.

(OTOH, threading was broken anyway, and the Subject: was lost anyway, so
technically it's totally unclear whether any comments in this sub-thread
applied to a particular proposal or not - so: when commenting about a 
proposal, please keep the number in the Subject: or clearly mention in
the text of the mail what your comments refer to...)

And, indeed, let's focus on the particular proposals on the table.

thanks,

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151029/c8195933/attachment.sig>