This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Thu Oct 22 08:07:54 CEST 2015
On Wed, Oct 21, 2015, at 13:20, Tom Smyth wrote: > Perhaps people would support the Proposal, if the there was a stricter > condition on the transfers, ie > > that the Lir has not had any transfered IPs added to its registry, (in > addtition to the rule that the Lir has not transferred IPs out of its > registry) You have a point but: - not sure people will support it better with this condition added - there may be legitimate cases where you managed to have a inbound transfer and you still need adresses. Those being said, stricter criteria is under investigation. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]