This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Netskin NOC
noc at netskin.com
Wed Oct 21 23:19:56 CEST 2015
Am 21.10.2015 um 23:00 schrieb Gert Doering: > > (And there would still never be sufficient IPv4, so I think that's why > the community decided a few years ago to not bother going there - we've > discussed this at RIPE meetings every now and then, and decided to better > focus on making good IPv6 policies instead) > The point is to speedup ipv6 adoption of the big ISPs by enforcing the return of existing ipv4 allocations over the next few years (tbd, like 10% of the allocated ipv4 space of each LIR per year). As a minor side effect everyone could get an /21 without any problems (which most probably wouldn't then be needed anymore anyway). Corin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]