[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)

I really envy to all of you that you have so much free time to write
messages here during all day and increase noise.
21 окт. 2015 г. 18:48 пользователь "Sander Steffann" <sander at steffann.nl>
написал:

> Hi,
>
> > Op 20 okt. 2015, om 23:57 heeft Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN <
> ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net> het volgende geschreven:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 20:00, Randy Bush wrote:
> >> what is it that people do not understand about "gone, no more, we're
> >> out, ...?"
> >
> > Because it's NOT. Not yet. Not in RIPE-land, not in APNIC-land, not even
> > in LACNIC-land. Not to mention AfriNIC-land.
>
> The current policy is "we reserved some address space so that new entrants
> are not blocked from the market". I have seen many people interpret that as
> "we have not yet run out". For all practical purposes we *have* run out.
> What we have left is not normal address distribution anymore but a
> "special" situation. Business-as-usual with IPv4 doesn't exist anymore. To
> be blunt I think that "we haven't run out" is a extremely misguided (a.k.a.
> delusional) viewpoint...
>
> The point of this policy proposal is to see whether we can optimise this
> special situation by changing some of the parameters. To discuss if the
> results of changing i.e. "one /22" to "one /22 every 18 months" would help
> people while still providing an acceptable timeframe for being able to give
> addresses to new entrants.
>
> But please realise that the normal IPv4 pool has run out and we are only
> discussing the usage of a reservation we made for special circumstances.
>
> Cheers,
> Sander
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151021/6187c9c0/attachment.html>