[address-policy-wg] 2015-05

Am 21.10.2015 um 14:40 schrieb Ciprian Nica:
>
> I would support something like this but with a few changes. I would set
> some milestones, let's say by the end of 2016 you need to have 5% IPv6
> adoption rate or you have to return 5% from the IPs that were allocated
> to you before the end of 2006 (so it would be a 10 year frame). Then at
> the end of 2017 they would need to have 10% IPv6 adoption rate or return
> 10% of the IPs allocated before the end of 2007 and so on.
>

What about a new policy proposal for that? Please let me know if you'd like to work on one together.

> Something like this would push the "old" ISPs to make the first steps
> towards IPv6 and would not affect the relatively new entrants whom would
> not make sense returning 50-100 IPs from their /22.
>

The last /22 (or even /21, which everybody can get then easily) shouldn't be affected.

> I would support this, although I know it would be very difficult to ask
> Telefonica to return Orange or Deutsche Telekom return millions of IPs.
> RIPE NCC is not the police but we can all think of a way to implement
> this, if the community would support it.
>

I'm no lawyer, but from a technical point of view it shouldn't be a problem for RIPE to disconnect them. Any I'm quite
sure they'll act before that happens.

Corin