This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Netskin NOC
noc at netskin.com
Wed Oct 21 14:31:54 CEST 2015
Am 21.10.2015 um 14:20 schrieb Ciprian Nica: > From theese, the top 1% PA resource holders (117 organisations) have > allocations totalling 363,535,872 IPs out of the total 575,180,544 > ALLOCATED PA IPs in RIPE region. (that is 63.20%) > > If the remaining 99% percent would fully deploy IPv6 then the region's > average would be at 36.80%, which would not be enough to make us forget > about IPv4. > > Therefore, in my oppinion, this is not a problem that can be solved by > the many but by the few top providers. Think about policies that would > "drive them to drive us all" towards IPv6 adoption. That would really help. > That's exactly my point. The current policy is mostly against new providers (I know many think it's a policy to help them). What about my previous suggestion, like a policy to force ipv4 space holders to return ex. 10% of their ipv4 per year. Money/ effort involved with the transition is no valid concern against it, because the same would hold true for the /21 limit for new LIRs. Corin
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]