This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tom Smyth
tom.smyth at wirelessconnect.eu
Wed Oct 21 14:08:12 CEST 2015
Point taken..Ciprian, however, just because a policy is difficult to police doensnt mean that it is not a valid policy... and i think practical policing options should be considered so that this policy will help isps, without rewarding isps that have perhaps being abusing loopholes. I think this would be helpful in aleviating IP conservation Concerns On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Ciprian Nica <office at ip-broker.uk> wrote: > The way you said it was like you were referring to anyone that bought > IPs from the market. > > What you are proposing is impossible to implement and still won't save > this policy. It's difficult to find a "better fairness" today and I > don't see a way this policy would help anyone except a few small...ish > providers. > > > On 10/21/2015 2:33 PM, Tom Smyth wrote: > > My point was that if people have used mechanisims such as new lir > +transfer > > /merge then they would not qualify for an additional alocation ... which > in > > my opinion is fair enough...and would still conserve ip address space for > > new lirs in future ... > > Do you love it now ;) ? > > On 21 Oct 2015 12:28, "Ciprian Nica" <office at ip-broker.uk> wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> On 10/21/2015 2:20 PM, Tom Smyth wrote: > >>> Perhaps people would support the Proposal, if the there was a stricter > >>> condition on the transfers, ie > >>> > >>> that the Lir has not had any transfered IPs added to its registry, (in > >>> addtition to the rule that the Lir has not transferred IPs out of its > >>> registry) > >> > >> So if some LIR needed IPs desperately enough to pay money for them, they > >> don't deserve to receive a free allocation from RIPE. > >> > >> <s>Yes, that would make everyone love this policy.</s> > >> > >> Ciprian > >> > >> > >> > > > -- Kindest regards, Tom Smyth Mobile: +353 87 6193172 --------------------------------- PLEASE CONSIDER THE ENVIRONMENT BEFORE YOU PRINT THIS E-MAIL This email contains information which may be confidential or privileged. The information is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity named above. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information is prohibited. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please notify me by telephone or by electronic mail immediately. Any opinions expressed are those of the author, not the company's .This email does not constitute either offer or acceptance of any contractually binding agreement. Such offer or acceptance must be communicated in writing. You are requested to carry out your own virus check before opening any attachment. Thomas Smyth accepts no liability for any loss or damage which may be caused by malicious software or attachments. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151021/6a921f5b/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]