[address-policy-wg] 2015-05

My point was that if people have used mechanisims such as new lir +transfer
/merge then they would not qualify for an additional alocation ... which in
my opinion is fair enough...and would still conserve ip address space for
new lirs in future ...
Do you  love it now ;) ?
On 21 Oct 2015 12:28, "Ciprian Nica" <office at ip-broker.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On 10/21/2015 2:20 PM, Tom Smyth wrote:
> > Perhaps people would support the Proposal, if the there was a stricter
> > condition on the transfers, ie
> >
> > that the Lir has not had any transfered IPs added to its registry,  (in
> > addtition to the rule that the Lir has not transferred IPs out of its
> > registry)
>
> So if some LIR needed IPs desperately enough to pay money for them, they
> don't deserve to receive a free allocation from RIPE.
>
> <s>Yes, that would make everyone love this policy.</s>
>
> Ciprian
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151021/5ccf1652/attachment.html>