This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT)
d.baeza at tvt-datos.es
Tue Oct 20 18:17:31 CEST 2015
Hi, As most of you will know, Im +1 to this proposal. Only one question about 5.1.3 An equivalent of a /22 allocation can be requested every 18 months from the moment of the *last allocation* if the following conditions are met: Last allocation in general or from RIPE NCC? Kind Regards, El 20/10/2015 a las 14:46, Marco Schmidt escribió: > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal, "Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria", > is now available for discussion. > > The goal of this proposal is to allow LIRs to request an additional /22 > IPv4 allocation from the RIPE NCC every 18 months. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <address-policy-wg at ripe.net> before 18 November 2015. > > Regards > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC >
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]