This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
ripe-wgs at radu-adrian.feurdean.net
Tue Oct 20 17:17:12 CEST 2015
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 16:01, h.lu at anytimechinese.com wrote: > Based on current v6 deploy rate, my guess is in 5 years an new start up > LIR would still appreciate a free /22 available for them. My crystal ball ( https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1QN-VW2U2rLiXn7uFvGt249mChXJ9Cjnq1PsyD4ALqtc/edit?usp=sharing ) has some doubts about it. ... and I can see that LIRs open (in oder to use IPv4 space for service not transfer) during the last 3 years have second thoughts after the inital joy of "we got a /22". -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]