This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
"Tomasz Śląski @ KEBAB"
tom at kebab.org.pl
Tue Oct 20 17:00:20 CEST 2015
W dniu 2015-10-20 o 16:56, Aleksey Bulgakov pisze: > Dear, all. > > I think it will be rightly to make progressive allocating depend on > current resource number and age of the LIR. > > E.g. > LIR has /16 - he can ask /16 or equivalent > Or > First 18 months - /22, second 18 months months - /21, third 18 months - /20 etc. > > I think it will supplement 2015-01 very good. > Do you think, that the remaining space from last /8 is made of rubber? -- Tomasz Śląski pl.skonet
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]