This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Dickinson, Ian
Ian.Dickinson at sky.uk
Tue Oct 20 16:07:04 CEST 2015
I am not yet convinced of this proposal in its entirety, but I am definitely against there being limitations based on LIR size of allocations (or age for that matter). If we are to do this, it should be for all LIRs without such limitation (though I might be ok with limits if addressing has been transferred from an LIR recently). An LIR with a /19 can have need. An LIR with a /10 equivalent can still have need. Ian -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:address-policy-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf Of Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN Sent: 20 October 2015 15:00 To: Riccardo Gori; address-policy-wg at ripe.net Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria) On Tue, Oct 20, 2015, at 15:25, Riccardo Gori wrote: > I would support it but I would add some text as follows > > 3. The LIR has not reached an address space equivalent to /20 in its > registry > [...] Hi, This is something that could be done provided there are enough people "for" and not many people "against". Any other opinions on this ? Including the size (proposed /20) ? -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN fr.ccs Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our internal and external networks. SKY and the SKY marks are trademarks of Sky plc and Sky International AG and are used under licence. Sky UK Limited (Registration No. 2906991), Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration No. 2067075) and Sky Subscribers Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) are direct or indirect subsidiaries of Sky plc (Registration No. 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph are incorporated in England and Wales and share the same registered office at Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD.
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]