This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Elvis Daniel Velea
elvis at velea.eu
Tue Oct 20 15:40:29 CEST 2015
Hi, On 10/20/15 4:06 PM, Peter Hessler wrote: > On 2015 Oct 20 (Tue) at 14:46:54 +0200 (+0200), Marco Schmidt wrote: > : https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2015-05 > > From the proposed text: > 5.1.3.2. There is enough space in the free pool to perform the allocation > > Is there a definition of "enough space in the free pool"? Is it a > single /22? > good question. Not sure what would happen if a single /22 is no longer available. My intention would be for the last allocation to be the remaining crumbs (even if less than a /22). Currently, the proposal's intention is to allow allocations lower than a /22 as long as the total would be 1024 IPs. regards, elvis
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] 2015-05 New Policy Proposal (Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]