This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/address-policy-wg@ripe.net/
[address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Randy Bush
randy at psg.com
Tue Nov 17 10:41:10 CET 2015
>> Every LIR really has to accept that they have to wean themselves off >> IPv4 and have a serious approach to using IPv6. You’re going to have >> to do this at some point. You might as well do it now. IPv4 >> allocations from the RIRs are not going to last forever. Changing >> the address policy for everyone just so you can continue with an >> IPv4-only networking approach for a few more months is both unfair >> and unwise. > > Well said, Jim. FWIW, I'm agreeing fully with what you say here. The > current "last /8" policy is working the way it should. the only thing i would add, with extreme sadness and some disgust, it that they could do as many have, go nat/cgn. randy
- Previous message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
- Next message (by thread): [address-policy-wg] Revision of Last /8 Allocation Criteria
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]