[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)

Hi,

how would you explain it when a company (non-member) would ask why can a new LIR still receive a 16bit ASN and they can't?

my 2 cents,
elvis

Excuse the briefness of this mail, it was sent from a mobile device.

PS: apologies for the top-post

> On Nov 13, 2015, at 00:46, Erik Bais <erik at bais.name> wrote:
> 
> Hi Peter, 
> 
>> Thinking out loud: We could also apply the "last /8 policy" to this.
>> After it goes into effect, each LIR can request one and only one 16b ASN.
>> 32b ASNs are allocated as normal (with the question asked, but not
>> evalutated).
> 
> I think that we are already beyond the point of handing out 1* 16b ASn to each LIR and there isn't that much left in the free pool I'm guessing .. ( that is my gut feeling .. ) 
> 
> But the NCC should be able to answer the total number in the RIPE pool ... 
> 
> Erik Bais 
> 
>