[address-policy-wg] 2014-03 Policy Proposal Withdrawn (Remove Multihoming Requirement for AS Number Assignments)

Hi,

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 09:55:26PM +0000, David Huberman wrote:
> Very good input, thank you Wilfried!
> 
> Does anyone else have any suggestions or objections to:
> 
> "A new AS number is only assigned when the network architecture and/or project has a need that cannot be satisfied by an existing AS number."
> 
> If there are no objections to this part of the text, that gives the WG a good foundation to build on in Bucharest, in my opinion.

Just to play the devil's advocate, who is to evaluate and understand these
"cannot be satisfied" reasons?  RIPE IPRAs are typically not BGP experts.

Not saying that this is not a good starting point, but we always need to
keep in mind that there are good people at the NCC who need to evaluate
these requests, and they might not all have the in-depth understanding 
of technology...

Gert Doering
        -- APWG chair
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 811 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/address-policy-wg/attachments/20151112/b84b42b9/attachment.sig>